Netherlands vs Sweden AI prediction
The model’s strongest regulation-time outcome is Netherlands win at 50%. Explore the complete probability picture and test alternative scoring assumptions below.
Prediction playground
Change either scoring rate. Every probability below recalculates immediately with a Poisson scoreline model.
Play this fixture once with the probabilities above. Every run is different.
What the score grid says
Aggregate markets below are calculated directly from the same exact score distribution—not produced as separate tips.
Netherlands 50% · Draw 20% · Sweden 30%
Yes 71% · No 29%
Over 75% · Under 25%
Most likely exact scores
Top five cells in the published score distribution.
Rows show Netherlands goals; columns show Sweden goals. All 256 published cells are included.
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2.6% | 3.2% | 2.9% | 1.7% | 0.8% | 0.3% | 0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% |
| 1 | 4.3% | 7.5% | 5.9% | 3.4% | 1.6% | 0.6% | 0.2% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% |
| 2 | 5.0% | 7.7% | 6.3% | 3.6% | 1.7% | 0.6% | 0.2% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% |
| 3 | 3.8% | 5.8% | 4.7% | 2.7% | 1.2% | 0.5% | 0.2% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% |
| 4 | 2.2% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 1.6% | 0.7% | 0.3% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% |
| 5 | 1.1% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 0.8% | 0.4% | 0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% |
| 6 | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.2% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% |
| 7 | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% |
| 8 | <0.1% | 0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% |
| 9 | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% |
| 10 | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% |
| 11 | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% |
| 12 | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% |
| 13 | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% |
| 14 | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% |
| 15 | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.1% |
From team strength to a score distribution.
- 01Fit team strengths
The upstream Bayesian model estimates attack, defence and home-advantage parameters from international results.
- 02Build match probabilities
Expected scoring rates produce an exact-score probability grid; 1X2, BTTS and goal totals are derived from it.
- 03Simulate the tournament
Repeated complete tournament paths produce progression and title probabilities for every team.